
How the fabless model changed the semiconductor industry
SRF Capital Studio Research DeskFunding Intelligence, SRF Capital StudioNvidia booked $215.9 billion of revenue in its last full year, and it owns no factory that makes its chips.
Summary
- Fabless companies design chips and pay a foundry to make them, a split that took off when TSMC opened in 1987 and now drives much of the industry's growth.
- The model swaps a plant costing $25 billion or more for a dependence: TSMC alone took 72.5% of foundry revenue in mid-2026.
- An Indian design startup needs engineers and software instead of a plant. Its hardest problems are foundry slots, prototype costs and a first buyer.
A clothing brand in Bengaluru can design a shirt, have it stitched by a contract unit in Tiruppur and sell it under its own label. Nobody thinks the brand is less real because it owns no sewing machines. For most of its history the chip industry worked the other way round. A company that wanted to sell chips had to own the plant that made them.
That changed in 1987, when TSMC opened in Taiwan with government backing. It would make chips only to other companies' designs and sell nothing under its own name. Firms that design chips without owning a plant came to be called fabless, after the fab, the trade's word for a chip factory.
TrendForce, a Taiwanese research firm, counts $359.4 billion of revenue at the ten largest fabless firms in 2025, up 44% in a year. Nvidia alone took 57% of it.
What do fabless, foundry, IDM and OSAT mean?
Four kinds of company now share the work of turning a drawing into a chip you can solder onto a circuit board. Each sits at a different step, and each spends its money on different things.
The four business models in chip making, and what each one spends on
| Type | What it does | Examples | Where its money goes |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDM (integrated device manufacturer) | Designs chips and makes them in its own plants | Intel, Texas Instruments, Micron | Plants and equipment, as well as design teams |
| Foundry | Makes chips to other companies' designs and sells none of its own | TSMC, GlobalFoundries, umc, smic | Plants, equipment and process research |
| Fabless | Designs and sells chips, and pays a foundry to make them | Nvidia, Qualcomm, Broadcom, AMD, MediaTek | Engineers, design software, licensed designs and prototypes |
| OSAT (outsourced assembly and test) | Cuts finished wafers into chips, packages them and tests them | ASE, Amkor; in India, Kaynes Semicon and CG Semi | Packaging lines and test equipment |
Two smaller trades grew up around them. Synopsys and Cadence sell the software engineers use to draw and check a chip. Arm licenses processor designs to chip companies and is paid a royalty on the chips that use them. None of these companies runs a chip plant.
The lines blur at the edges. Samsung and Intel run foundry businesses beside their own chips, and Apple designs the chips in its phones and laptops and buys the manufacturing from TSMC. Our semiconductor industry analysis maps the whole chain and the size of each part.
Why did chip design and chip making split apart?
Plants became too expensive for most chip companies to own. Tom's Hardware, citing industry estimates in 2026, puts a leading-edge 2-nanometre fab module at $25 billion to $35 billion to build and equip. India's first commercial fab, Tata Electronics' plant at Dholera on older processes, carries an approved cost of ₹91,000 crore.
A plant that expensive only pays if it runs close to full, every month, for years. As an illustration, a $30 billion plant written off over five years carries $6 billion of cost a year before it ships a single wafer. Few chip companies have enough designs of their own to keep one busy.
A foundry solves that by pooling demand. It fills one plant with orders from hundreds of customers, so no single design has to pay for the building. Each customer buys wafers as it needs them and never has to raise billions up front.
Design bills climbed as well. IBS, a consultancy, estimates that designing one chip at 2 nanometres costs about $725 million, and its figures are usually treated as an upper bound. Even at half that, few companies can fund the design and the plant at once.
AMD made the choice in public. In 2009 it moved its plants into a new company, GlobalFoundries, financed largely from Abu Dhabi, and it has bought its manufacturing ever since. In 2025 it reported record revenue of $34.6 billion.
How do fabless companies earn their money?
A fabless company sells chips, and its biggest cost is buying them. It pays the foundry for each finished wafer, then pays for packaging and testing, and books all of that as the cost of what it sold. What is left, the gross margin, pays for the engineers and software behind the next chip.
That margin is wide when a design is hard to copy. Nvidia's gross margin was 71.1% in the year to January 2026, so of every $100 of sales about $29 went on making the product, memory and packaging included. AMD's was 50% in 2025, and MediaTek's 47.5%.
Revenue at the five largest fabless chip companies, in US dollars, from each company's latest full financial year
| Company | Revenue, latest full year | Year ended | What it mainly designs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | $215.9 billion | January 2026 | AI accelerators and graphics chips |
| Qualcomm (chip business) | $38.4 billion | September 2025 | Smartphone processors, car and connected-device chips |
| Broadcom (chip business) | $36.9 billion | November 2025 | Custom AI chips and networking chips |
| AMD | $34.6 billion | December 2025 | PC and server processors, AI accelerators |
| MediaTek | NT$596.0 billion, about $19.1 billion | December 2025 | Smartphone processors, Wi-Fi and TV chips |
Two of the five earn money in other ways too. Qualcomm's total revenue was $44.3 billion, because it also licenses its mobile patents. Broadcom's was $63.9 billion, of which about $27 billion came from infrastructure software.
This year has been sharper still. Nvidia reported $96.2 billion of revenue in the single quarter to July 2026, up 106% on a year earlier. What is driving that is set out in our piece on the AI-driven chip boom.
Where does the risk sit in a fabless business?
A fabless company still carries manufacturing risk, held through a contract with a foundry that decides whose orders come first.
Concentration is the first part of it. TrendForce put TSMC at 72.5% of foundry revenue in the second quarter of 2026, with Samsung second at 5.9%. For the most advanced chips, most designers have one realistic supplier, and it sits in Taiwan.
When capacity runs short, the largest customers are served first. Carmakers, small buyers by a foundry's standards, found this out in 2021. AlixPartners forecast that year that chip shortages would cost them about $210 billion of revenue, with COVID lockdowns at Malaysian assembly and test plants making it worse.
The second part is commitment. Wafers are ordered months ahead, so the fabless firm carries the stock when demand or rules change. AMD booked about $440 million of inventory and related charges in 2025 after US export controls stopped sales of one AI chip to China.
A fabless company still carries manufacturing risk, held through a contract with a foundry that decides whose orders come first.
The third is geography. Most leading-edge chips are made in Taiwan, and so is most of the advanced packaging behind AI accelerators. Our note on HBM memory and advanced packaging explains why that last step is now as scarce as the chips.
Governments have drawn the same conclusion. The US and European chip acts, and India's own Semiconductor Mission, are partly public money paying for plants outside Taiwan.
What does this mean for an Indian chip-design startup?
For a founder, the fabless model is the cheapest way into chips. A startup's money goes on engineers and design software, and India has the engineers. The IT minister told the Rajya Sabha in March 2026 that India hosts nearly 20% of the world's chip design workforce.
Most of them work in the Indian centres of Qualcomm, Nvidia, AMD, MediaTek and others, on chips those companies own. Why so little of that work becomes Indian-owned product is the subject of our piece on India's chances as a chip hub.
How much of the design bill does the government pay?
Under the Design Linked Incentive scheme, run by MeitY through C-DAC, an eligible startup can claim back up to 50% of its design spend, capped at ₹15 crore. A second incentive pays 6% falling to 4% of the chip's net sales over five years, capped at ₹30 crore.
Both are paid after the money is spent, against milestones, so the founder still funds the gross cost first. PIB reported in January 2026 that the scheme backed 24 design projects. Between them they had completed 16 tape-outs, the step where a finished design goes to the foundry, and had six chips fabricated.
Reading those rules against a real budget is part of our grants and schemes work.
Why is foundry access the hard part?
An Indian startup is a tiny customer, and leading-edge capacity is booked by companies buying billions of dollars of wafers. Most start on older, cheaper processes and share a wafer with other designs in a multi-project run. Each design pays a slice of the mask and wafer cost, and gets back a small batch of prototypes.
Volume production is a separate negotiation, with minimum orders and a queue. The IT minister now expects the Dholera fab to begin commercial operations in mid-2028, on mature processes. Until then an Indian fabless company will have its chips made abroad.
Who buys the first chips?
A car or telecom company can take a year or more to approve a new chip, and the startup pays its engineers the whole time. A few Indian teams are past the early stages. Mindgrove Technologies raised an $8 million for its microcontroller chips, and Netrasemi raised ₹107 crore in 2025 in a round led by Zoho.
What should a founder or investor ask a chip-design company first?
Four questions separate a serious chip-design plan from a hopeful one.
- Which process, and which foundry? A plan that names a node, a foundry and a booked shuttle date is further along than one that says it will use an advanced node.
- What does first silicon cost, gross? Count engineers, tool licences, masks and testing up to the first working chip, then fund the whole sum, since incentives arrive later.
- Who buys it, and how long will they take to approve it? A signed evaluation with a named customer is worth more than a slide on market size.
- Can the company survive a second run? A first chip may need fixing and a fresh set of masks. Budget for one more run, and for the months it adds.
The economics look closer to software than to a factory: heavy spending up front, then wide margins if the chip wins. Our VC and PE team and deep-tech practice work on raises of this shape.
Frequently asked questions
What is the fabless model in semiconductors?
A company designs chips and sells them under its own name, and pays a separate foundry to manufacture them. It spends on engineers, design software and licensed designs, and owns no chip plant.
What is the difference between fabless, foundry and IDM?
A fabless firm designs and sells chips without making them. A foundry makes chips to other firms' designs and sells none of its own. An IDM, such as Intel or Texas Instruments, does both.
How do fabless companies make money?
They sell chips for more than the foundry, packaging and test bills. The gross margin left over, 71.1% at Nvidia in its last full year, pays for research and the next design.
Is Nvidia a fabless company?
Yes. Nvidia designs its chips and relies mainly on TSMC to make them. It reported $215.9 billion of revenue in the year to January 2026 without owning a chip plant.
Which fabless semiconductor companies are in India?
Most chip design in India happens in the local centres of foreign fabless firms such as Qualcomm, Nvidia and MediaTek. Indian-owned fabless startups include Mindgrove Technologies, Netrasemi and InCore Semiconductors. Saankhya Labs, another, was bought by Tejas Networks in 2022.
Figures as at October 2026; company figures are from each company's own results.
How useful was this article?
One tap. It tells us what to write more of.

About the author
SRF Capital Studio Research Desk
Funding Intelligence, SRF Capital Studio
The next one
Get what we publish next, by email.
Working notes on raising, borrowing, protecting, growing and structuring capital in India. One email a week at most, and you can leave any time.
We use your address only to send this. See our privacy policy.
We store your address to send you these emails and nothing else. See our privacy policy.
The services behind this article
What we do about it, for founders and finance teams. Each has its own page.

Market Intelligence
A continuous read on the sector: what is moving capital, regulation and demand, and what it means for this business.

Venture Capital & Private Equity
Investment readiness, fundraising strategy, diligence preparation and transaction support for founders raising institutional equity.

Government Grants & Schemes
Identifying, applying for and staying compliant with the non-dilutive government funding a business already qualifies for.


