Where the margin sits in robotics: components, robot makers and integrators
SRF Capital Studio Research DeskFunding Intelligence, SRF Capital StudioFANUC earns more than 21 cents of operating profit on every yen of sales. ABB Robotics earned about 12 and is being sold. The difference says more about business structure than about robots.
Summary
- FANUC earned a 21.4% operating margin in the year to March 2026; ABB Robotics earned a 12.1% operational EBITA margin in 2024 and is being sold to SoftBank.
- The gap comes from structure: FANUC makes its own motors and controllers, runs from one site and avoids acquisitions, while ABB's robot unit competed for capital inside a conglomerate.
- Across the chain, components, software and service earn the most and project integration the least, so Indian firms should be judged by how much of their revenue comes from the high-margin layers.
A common assumption about robotics companies is that they are high-margin technology businesses. Some are. Many are not. The best way to see why is to put two of the industry's largest robot makers side by side.
Two robot makers, two outcomes
Three robot makers and their margins
| Measure | FANUC | ABB Robotics | Yaskawa Robotics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Period | Year to March 2026 | Calendar 2024 | Year to Feb 2026, forecast |
| Robotics revenue | ¥378.6 billion | USD 2.3 billion | ¥236.1 billion |
| Margin reported | 21.4% operating, whole group | 12.1% operational EBITA | 9.2% segment operating |
| Owner in September 2026 | Independent, listed in Tokyo | ABB, sale to SoftBank pending | Independent, listed in Tokyo |
The margins are not measured identically, and FANUC's figure covers its whole business, including factory-automation controls and machines. Even allowing for that, the spread is large and has persisted for years.
ABB drew its own conclusion. In April 2025 it planned to list the robotics division separately. In October 2025 it agreed instead to sell it to SoftBank Group for an enterprise value of USD 5.375 billion. The European Commission cleared the deal in March 2026, and at its July 2026 results ABB still expected to complete the sale in the second half of the year. The price is about 2.3 times the division's 2024 revenue, a respectable figure for a business earning low-teens margins, and one that reflects SoftBank's bet on AI-driven robotics as much as the unit's current returns.
Why FANUC earns more
FANUC's advantage is not a better robot. Payload, reach and accuracy are broadly comparable across the leading brands. The advantage comes from three choices it has made consistently for decades.
- It makes the expensive parts. FANUC builds its own servo motors and controllers, the components that carry much of a robot's cost. The margin a rival pays to a supplier stays inside FANUC.
- It runs lean from one place. Engineering and manufacturing are concentrated at its base in Yamanashi, which keeps overhead unusually low for a company of its size.
- It grows without buying. FANUC has expanded almost entirely organically, so it carries no acquisition goodwill and no integration costs.
ABB Robotics had the scale and the brand. What it lacked was focus: a division making about 7% of group revenue, with lower margins than its siblings, never gets first call on capital. The sale is not evidence that robotics is a poor business. It is evidence that robotics rewards companies built around it.
The sale is not evidence that robotics is a poor business. It is evidence that robotics rewards companies built around it.
The margin map across the chain
The robot makers sit in the middle of a longer chain, and the margin gradient along it is steep. Precision components such as reducers are made by very few suppliers and earn the richest hardware margins. Software for simulation, vision and fleet management, once written, sells at software margins. Service and spares, sold to a captive installed base, earn far more than the original hardware sale. At the bottom sits project integration: designing, installing and commissioning cells, one customer at a time.
Industry estimates put integration gross margins at around 15 to 25%, against 45 to 60% for service and higher still for software and precision components. These are indicative ranges rather than audited figures, but the ordering is consistent across every source we have seen. We lay out the full chain in the robotics value chain and India's integrators.
What this means for Indian firms
Most Indian robotics businesses are integrators or distributors, which puts them in the thinnest layer. Their reported margins can look healthy in a good year, but the business underneath is exposed: the robot maker controls the price of the main component, each project needs fresh engineering, and customers pay late.
The way up follows the FANUC pattern at a smaller scale. Own the parts of the offer that carry margin, which for an Indian firm usually means service contracts, application software and standard cell designs rather than hardware. Stay narrow enough to be the specialist in one or two industries. And grow the recurring base before the project base.
How an investor should read the numbers
- Split the revenue. Hardware resale, integration projects, service contracts and software each deserve their own margin line. A blended margin tells you little.
- Track the service share. A rising proportion of revenue from contracts and spares is the clearest sign a firm is moving up the chain.
- Look at cash, not just margin. Integration businesses with long milestone terms can post good margins while burning working capital. The cash conversion cycle matters as much as .
- Check who sets the hardware price. A distributor whose main supplier can reprice at will has less margin than its accounts suggest.
- Be wary of paying software multiples for bundled software. Ask whether customers pay for it separately and renew it.
Investors looking at Indian automation assets can use our due diligence practice to test these points. The full sector picture, including India's market size and risks, is in our report on robotics in manufacturing in India, and the financing side of the MSME market is covered in robots as a service.
How useful was this article?
One tap. It tells us what to write more of.
About the author
SRF Capital Studio Research Desk
Funding Intelligence, SRF Capital Studio
The next one
Get what we publish next, by email.
Working notes on raising, borrowing, protecting, growing and structuring capital in India. One email a week at most, and you can leave any time.
We use your address only to send this. See our privacy policy.
We store your address to send you these emails and nothing else. See our privacy policy.
Related reading