Skip to content
    A closed bound register lying on a desk
    Research Briefs

    Your ESOP pool may not legally exist

    September 23, 2026 · Article · 7 min read

    CS Manavi AroraLead - Company Secretarial, Compliance & Fundraise Advisory

    Eighteen people hold grant letters, the cap table shows ten per cent, and nobody ever passed the resolution that creates any of it.

    Summary

    • An option pool is real only when three documents are: the shareholder resolution approving the scheme, the written scheme itself, and a signed grant letter for every holder.
    • The gap is almost never carelessness. A pool gets agreed in a term sheet, drawn into the cap table and promised in offer letters, and nobody is ever given the job of creating it.
    • Repair it before a round rather than during one. Fixing it inside diligence means approving the pool properly and reissuing every grant, which reopens terms with each employee at the worst possible moment.

    Here is a test that takes two minutes.

    Can you produce, right now, the shareholder resolution that created your employee stock option pool? The written scheme that governs it? A signed grant letter for every person holding options?

    In our experience most companies below can produce one of those three. Usually the grant letters, because those went to employees. Sometimes nothing at all.

    If that is you, this is common and it is repairable. It is also far cheaper to repair now than in the middle of a raise. Here is what is actually required, how the gap opens, and the order in which to close it.

    What actually makes an option pool real?

    An option pool is not a decision you take. It is an approval you obtain, plus documents that exist.

    One: the shareholder resolution. Issuing shares to employees under an option scheme runs through section 62(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. For an unlisted company the detail sits in Rule 12 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014. That rule asks for a special resolution: three votes in favour for every one against.

    Not a board resolution. Not a line in a . A shareholder resolution, properly convened, properly recorded and filed. For how the board meeting and the shareholder meeting are supposed to run, see the board governance guide.

    Two: the written scheme. One document, setting out who is eligible, the size of the pool, how options vest, and the exercise price. It also fixes the exercise period and what happens when someone leaves. The resolution approves the scheme. The scheme is the rulebook.

    Three: the signed grant letters. For each person: how many options, at what price, vesting from what date, on what schedule. Signed by both sides, and matching an option register the company keeps.

    Without all three, what your employees hold is a promise from the company. It may be morally binding. It is not an option.

    If any of this is new, how ESOPs work end to end covers the approvals, the vesting and the tax in one place.

    Why does this happen to careful founders?

    Nobody decides to skip it. The sequence is almost always the same.

    The pool is agreed in a term sheet. "A 10% will be created." Everyone treats it as settled, because commercially it is.

    It goes into the cap table immediately. The pool then appears in every version of your cap table, in the deck and in the investor's model. It looks real because everyone is looking at it.

    Offers get made. New hires are told they will receive options. Offer letters mention them. Sometimes a grant letter follows, drafted from a template found online. Sometimes not.

    Nobody was asked to implement it. The company secretary engagement is transactional: incorporation, annual filings, the round itself. Creating a scheme was not in scope and nobody raised it. The accountant assumes it is a legal matter. The lawyer who did the round assumes it is a secretarial one.

    Two years pass. Eighteen people hold grant letters. The pool has been topped up once. Then diligence starts, and somebody asks for the scheme.

    The founder is not careless in this story. There was simply nobody whose job it was to notice.

    What does it cost you if nobody notices?

    It is a first-week finding in diligence. Option records are among the first files a diligence team opens. Finding this here means everything after it gets examined more closely, which is a cost of its own. What else a diligence team opens early explains how that calibration works.

    Fixing it mid-round means renegotiating with your team. The pool has to be approved properly and every grant reissued under the new scheme. That is a conversation with each employee about why their options are being reissued. Reasonable people ask reasonable questions.

    Some will ask for the vesting clock to run from the original date, which is usually fair and which you will probably concede. A few negotiate harder the second time.

    Your word is on the line. This is the part that matters beyond the transaction. You told people they own something. Having to ask them to sign for it again costs trust in a way that is hard to quantify and easy to feel.

    It can move the deal economics. If the pool was represented as existing and does not, the fix can produce nobody modelled. Or a warranty and indemnity you carry personally.

    Run this self-test before your next raise

    For each item: yes, no, or not sure. Treat "not sure" as a no until you have seen the document.

    Check the approval and the pool size

    • Is there a special resolution of shareholders approving the issue of shares under an option scheme?
    • Was it filed, and can you produce the filing?
    • Does the approved pool size match what your shows?
    • If the pool has been topped up, was each increase separately approved?

    Check the scheme document

    • Is there a written scheme at all?
    • Does it specify eligibility, vesting, the exercise price basis and the exercise period?
    • Does it say what happens on resignation, termination, death and disability?
    • Does it address what happens if the company is acquired?

    Check the grants and the people

    • Does every option holder have a signed grant letter that matches the scheme's terms?
    • Is there an option register listing every grant, its date, price, vesting schedule and status?
    • Does granted plus ungranted equal the approved pool?
    • Is every holder eligible, meaning an employee or director of the company, its holding company or its subsidiary?
    • Have grants gone to promoters, promoter-group shareholders, advisors or consultants who may not be eligible?
    • Does the fully diluted number in your cap table include the entire approved pool, granted and ungranted?

    Twelve or more clean answers out of fourteen means small repairs. Below eight, start now rather than next quarter.

    Fix it in this order, starting today

    The good news: this is routine work when there is no deadline attached to it.

    Establish the facts. List every person who has been promised or granted options, when, how many, at what price and on what vesting. Include people who have left. Include verbal promises, especially those, because they appear nowhere and they do not go away.

    Reconcile against the cap table. Total the promises and compare them with the pool in your cap table. The two rarely match, and the gap tells you what size pool you actually need to approve.

    Draft the scheme properly. Eligibility, vesting, acceleration, exercise price and period, leaver treatment, administration. You will live with this document for years, so treat it as a design exercise rather than a formality.

    Get the approvals. Board approval, then the shareholder special resolution, then the filing. If investors already sit on your cap table they vote, so bring them in early rather than presenting a fix to a problem they will then ask about.

    Reissue the grants. Fresh grant letters referencing the approved scheme, preserving the original vesting commencement dates where that is what was promised. Explain the position honestly. People respond well to "we are formalising something that should have been formalised earlier" and badly to finding out themselves.

    Build the register and keep it. One sheet, updated at every grant, exercise, lapse and exit. This is what a diligence team will ask for, and maintaining it takes minutes a month.

    Tell your team about the tax. Separate from the fix, but the right moment for it. Most option holders have no idea that tax falls due at exercise, on a paper gain, in cash. The tax your team will owe at exercise sets it out, and a one-page note with every grant letter prevents years of confusion.

    What to do if diligence has already started

    Different situation, and the advice changes.

    Do not quietly construct documents with earlier dates. Backdating is visible. Signatures that do not vary, resolutions dated on holidays, minute books written in a single hand: a diligence team that suspects it will treat everything else you produced as unreliable.

    Disclose it, present a plan with dates, and start executing before you are asked to. A known issue with an owner and a timeline is a condition to be satisfied. The same issue found by the investor's lawyer is a question about what else you have not mentioned.

    Frequently asked questions

    What documents are needed to create an ESOP pool in India?

    Three. A special resolution of shareholders approving the issue of shares under an option scheme. That sits in section 62(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 12 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014. A written scheme covering eligibility, vesting, exercise price, exercise period and leaver treatment. And a signed grant letter for each option holder, supported by an option register. A pool that appears only in a cap table has not been created.

    What happens if an ESOP pool was never formally approved?

    The options are not legally valid options. Employees hold a promise rather than a right. It is typically found during due diligence, where it becomes a condition to be satisfied before closing. The fix means approving the pool properly and reissuing every grant under the new scheme, which reopens terms with each holder at an unhelpful moment.

    Can an ESOP pool be created retrospectively?

    The pool can be approved and the grants reissued under the new scheme, with vesting commencement dates preserved to reflect what was originally promised. What cannot be done is backdating documents to suggest the approval existed earlier. Diligence teams identify backdated records readily, and doing so casts doubt on every other document the company produces.

    If you want the resolution, scheme, grant letters and option register checked and put right in one pass, our compliance and governance work starts there.

    Current as at September 2026. Requirements and eligibility conditions change. This is general guidance, not legal advice: take advice on your own position.

    How useful was this article?

    One tap. It tells us what to write more of.

    Not usefulVery useful

    About the author

    CS Manavi Arora

    Lead - Company Secretarial, Compliance & Fundraise Advisory

    Everything Manavi has writtenLinkedIn

    The next one

    Get what we publish next, by email.

    Working notes on raising, borrowing, protecting, growing and structuring capital in India. One email a week at most, and you can leave any time.

    We use your address only to send this. See our privacy policy.

    We store your address to send you these emails and nothing else. See our privacy policy.

    Related reading