Why price level is the last decision, not the first
Nagle and Holden draw pricing as a pyramid: value creation, price structure, value communication, pricing policy, and only then price level. Most companies work it upside down, starting at the number and never touching structure or policy. For Indian startups there is a sixth thing the original model assumed you already had.
Summary
- Price level sits at the top of the pyramid and is almost entirely decided by the four layers under it: value creation, price structure, value communication and pricing policy.
- Most companies work the pyramid upside down, so every commercial problem gets experienced as a price problem when the real loss is in structure and policy.
- The original model treats cost as a limit beside the pyramid. For Indian startups and MSMEs it belongs underneath it, as the contribution margin floor the model assumed you already knew.
Almost every pricing conversation we're pulled into starts the same way. What should we be charging?
It's a fair question. It's also the last one you should be asking, and asking it first is why most pricing decisions feel unstable: you pick a number, it doesn't feel right, you pick another one, and nothing actually improves.
There's a well-known way of laying this out, from Thomas Nagle and Reed Holden, whose book has been the standard text on pricing for close to forty years. They draw it as a pyramid with five layers. Price level (the actual number) sits right at the top. Four other things sit underneath holding it up.
Read from the bottom: value creation, then price structure, then value communication, then pricing policy, then price level.
The point of the picture is the order. Everything below the top decides what the top can be.
Layer 1: value creation
Before any price exists, you've already decided who you serve, what's in the product, and what it's actually worth to them.
Price is a claim on value. If the value isn't there, or isn't different from what they can get elsewhere, no clever pricing will rescue it. This is the widest layer because it sets your ceiling, and nothing above it can lift that ceiling.
It's also the layer most founders think is a product question rather than a pricing one. It's both.
Layer 2: price structure
Not the number. The shape.
What do you charge per: a seat, a transaction, a site, a tonne? How are your plans or tiers split? What separates a customer who pays less from one who pays more? What's bundled and what's sold separately?
This is where you decide whether different customers can pay different amounts for good reasons. Get the structure right and you can serve the price-sensitive buyer and the premium buyer at the same time. Get it wrong and you're stuck choosing one, which is exactly why so many companies feel trapped between "too expensive for small customers" and "leaving money on the table with large ones."
Layer 3: value communication
The value you built is worth nothing in a negotiation if the buyer can't see it.
This layer is your ROI case, your before-and-after numbers, your customer stories, and a sales team that can put a rupee figure on what you save or earn them, rather than just saying the product is good.
Here's the part worth sitting with. Most price objections aren't really about price. They're about value the buyer hasn't understood yet. And discounting to solve them treats the symptom while leaving the cause exactly where it was.
Layer 4: pricing policy
The rules for how you behave when someone pushes back.
Who can approve a discount, and how deep? What do you have to get in return? What do you do when a competitor cuts price? What happens when a customer finds out someone else got a better deal?
Policy is what makes your price believable over time. Without it, buyers learn that your price depends on how hard they push, and they will keep pushing, at every renewal, forever.
Layer 5: price level
The number. Top of the pyramid. Narrowest layer. Last decision.
And almost entirely decided by the four layers below it.
Why this matters for founders
Because most companies work the pyramid upside down.
They start at the top, asking what they should charge, never touch structure or policy, and then experience every commercial problem as a price problem. Sales is slow, so cut the price. Margin is thin, so raise the price. Competitor undercut us, so match them.
None of those are price decisions.
They're symptoms of the layers nobody built.
Here's a quick exercise worth doing with your leadership team. Draw the five layers on a whiteboard. Ask everyone to mark where they've spent their pricing thinking over the last year.
Almost every mark lands in the top layer.
Then ask where the business is actually losing money. It's almost always policy and structure. That gap (drawn by your own team, on your own whiteboard) makes the argument better than any framework explanation will.
One thing the pyramid leaves out
Worth being straight about this, because it matters more in India than where the model came from.
Cost isn't one of the five layers. Nagle treats it as a limit sitting alongside, not a step in the ladder. That's fair enough for the large companies the book was written for: they already have proper costing systems and know their numbers.
Most Indian startups and MSMEs don't. And that changes the advice.
For you, the cost floor isn't beside the pyramid. It's underneath it. Before any of the five layers is useful, you need to know the number below which a deal loses you money: your contribution margin floor. Without it, good work on structure and policy still ends in a deal that shouldn't have been signed.
So think of it as five layers, sitting on a foundation the original model assumed you already had.
Where to start
Don't start with the number.
Start one layer down and ask two questions. Does our structure let different customers pay different amounts for reasons we can defend? And do we have rules that hold when a buyer pushes back?
If the answer to either is no, the number was never your problem.
How useful was this article?
One tap. It tells us what to write more of.
The next one
Get what we publish next, by email.
Working notes on raising, borrowing, protecting, growing and structuring capital in India. One email a week at most, and you can leave any time.
We use your address only to send this. See our privacy policy.
We store your address to send you these emails and nothing else. See our privacy policy.
Related reading
