Demand generation: pipeline is built, not found
"We need more leads" is the most common diagnosis in business, and it is usually offered with a shrug. Pipeline is not weather. Four numbers turn a revenue target into a monthly enquiry target with a date on it, and a name against it.
Summary
- Pipeline is an output, not weather. Four numbers (deal size, win rate, qualification rate, deal length) turn a revenue target into a monthly enquiry target with a date on it.
- Two mistakes break the maths: borrowing someone else's coverage ratio, and using an average deal size that describes nothing you actually sell.
- Most demand generation breaks at the handoff, because nobody has written down what a qualified enquiry is.
"We need more leads."
It's the most common diagnosis in business, and it's usually offered with a shrug, as though the number of enquiries arriving each month is weather. Some months are good. Some months aren't. You hope for a good one.
Pipeline is not weather. It's an output.
You can work out almost exactly how much of it your plan needs, and by when, and then hold someone responsible for producing that much. Very few companies do, which is why "we need more leads" is a complaint rather than a target.
Demand generation is the second pillar of a revenue operating system, and the whole discipline sits in one idea: work backwards from the number.
The equation
Start at the end and go up the funnel.
You need ₹12 crore of new revenue this year. Your average deal is ₹20 lakh, so that's 60 deals.
You win roughly one in four of the serious opportunities you work, so you need 240 qualified opportunities.
About one in three enquiries turns into a qualified opportunity, so you need around 720 enquiries.
Your average deal takes four months from enquiry to signature, so the enquiries that produce your fourth-quarter revenue have to arrive by the end of the second quarter.
That's the whole thing. Four numbers (deal size, win rate, qualification rate, deal length) turn a revenue target into a monthly enquiry target with a date on it.
Now "we need more leads" becomes "we need 60 enquiries a month and we're running at 34." That's not a complaint. That's a gap somebody owns.
Where the maths goes wrong
Two mistakes, both common.
Borrowing someone else's coverage ratio. You'll hear rules of thumb: three times coverage, four times coverage. They come from someone else's win rate and someone else's deal length. If your win rate is 20% and you plan on a ratio built for a company winning 35%, you'll be confidently short and won't know until the quarter is gone. Use your own numbers, even if they're rough.
Using an average deal size that doesn't exist. If your enterprise deals are ₹60 lakh and your small deals are ₹4 lakh, the average of ₹20 lakh describes nothing you actually sell. Run the equation separately for each segment. The enquiry targets will look completely different, and that difference is the useful part.
Not all enquiries are the same
Once you have a number, the next question is where the enquiries come from. And they're not interchangeable.
In most Indian B2B businesses the channels break down roughly like this.
Referrals and word of mouth. The best quality, the worst predictability. Almost every company we work with is over-dependent on this and under-invested in understanding it. If half your pipeline comes from referrals and you've never asked what triggers one, you have a growth engine you don't control.
Founder and leadership networks. Excellent early, and a ceiling later. Every company eventually hits the point where the founder's network is fully worked. The dangerous part is that this happens gradually, so it looks like a slowdown rather than a structural limit.
Outbound. Predictable and expensive. It works when your target list is definable and your message is specific. It fails when it's a volume exercise.
Content and search. Slow to start, compounds over time, cheap once it's working. The mistake is judging it on a three-month horizon, which is roughly when it does nothing.
Events, associations and trade bodies. Still significant in Indian B2B and often dismissed by companies that read too much Western SaaS advice.
Partners, channel and resellers. High leverage when you invest in enabling them, and dead weight when you don't.
The useful exercise isn't ranking these. It's working out what share of your pipeline each one produces today, what it costs, and what its conversion rate is. Most founders can guess the first and have no idea about the other two.
The handoff nobody owns
Here's where most demand generation actually breaks, and it isn't at the top of the funnel.
Marketing produces enquiries. Sales says they're rubbish. Marketing says sales isn't working them. Both are partly right, and the argument runs for years in companies that never fix the underlying problem.
The underlying problem is that nobody has written down what a qualified enquiry is.
Fix it with one afternoon and one document. What has to be true about an enquiry before sales accepts it? Which industry, which size, which role, what stated problem, what buying timeframe. Agree it between both teams. Write it down.
Then measure two things: how many enquiries meet the definition, and what share of those that do actually convert. If enquiries meeting the definition convert badly, the definition is wrong. If they convert well but there aren't enough, that's a volume problem with a clear owner.
Without that definition, you can't tell a marketing problem from a sales problem, and the argument is unwinnable.
Quality has a price, and so does quantity
One more thing worth saying because it links directly to your margins.
When pipeline is thin, sales teams work whatever they can get. That means pursuing poor-fit customers, which means longer deals, more discounting, worse retention, and a higher cost to serve.
A thin pipeline doesn't just reduce revenue. It reduces the price you actually get, because a salesperson with two deals in the quarter will do almost anything to close one of them.
That's a cost that never shows up in a marketing budget conversation, and it's often larger than the spend being argued over.
Review it as a leading number
Pipeline belongs in your monthly review as a forward number, not a backward one.
The wrong question: how many enquiries did we get last month?
The right question: do we have enough qualified pipeline, today, to hit the quarter after next, given our conversion rate and our deal length?
That question can be answered months ahead of the miss it predicts, which is the entire point of the pillar. By the time a pipeline shortfall shows up in revenue, it's been fixable for a quarter and a half.
How this looks by business
The idea holds everywhere. The mechanics change.
A hospital's demand comes from referring doctors, corporate tie-ups, insurance empanelment and camps. A manufacturer's comes from dealer coverage, OEM approvals and tenders. A D2C brand's is traffic and cost per acquisition, measured daily. A SaaS company's is either sign-ups or sales enquiries depending on its motion.
Same logic in every case: know your conversion, work backwards from the target, and give someone the number.
Where to start
Take your revenue plan and run the equation backwards. Deal size, win rate, qualification rate, deal length. Get to a monthly enquiry target.
Then compare it to what you're actually producing.
That one calculation converts your most common complaint into your most useful target, and it takes about an hour.
How useful was this article?
One tap. It tells us what to write more of.
The next one
Get what we publish next, by email.
Working notes on raising, borrowing, protecting, growing and structuring capital in India. One email a week at most, and you can leave any time.
We use your address only to send this. See our privacy policy.
We store your address to send you these emails and nothing else. See our privacy policy.
Related reading
